UN 'Plastic Treaty' Negotiations Set to Resume: Consensus Remains Elusive, United States (US) May Make a 360° Shift...
August 5, 2025Under the auspices of the United NationsThe Fifth Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2)The conference will be held again at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, in an attempt to reach a consensus on a legally binding global agreement to combat plastic pollution.As of the publication date, differences remain and the prospects for negotiations are still unclear.
Since the first round of negotiations was launched in Nairobi in December 2022, global "plastic treaty" discussions have gone through several rounds but have yet to reach a final agreement. The INC-5.0 meeting, held in South Korea in December 2024, reached a stalemate, with differing explanations from various parties: environmental organizations like Greenpeace point to strong lobbying by the petrochemical industry as the main obstacle, while industry representatives argue that the negotiations have overly expanded their goals by attempting to limit plastic production itself, deviating from the original intent of controlling pollution.
The basis for negotiation at this Geneva conference is the “Chair’s Text” drafted on December 1, 2024, which clearly states the goal of “taking comprehensive measures at all stages of the plastic lifecycle to protect human health and the environment, especially the marine environment, from the impacts of plastic pollution.” The draft outlines in detail various possible pathways to achieve this goal, but due to the involvement of multiple stages including production, consumption, recycling, and governance, implementation is quite challenging.

— 1 —
The U.S. stance may become a key variable.
It is worth noting that the shift in the U.S. stance may become a significant variable in these negotiations. The current U.S. President, Trump, opposes multilateralism.Under his leadership, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has gradually revoked several regulatory policies targeting the chemical industry.Analysts point out that under the directives of the Trump administration, the U.S. delegation may adopt a more pragmatic rather than radical approach compared to the Biden era.
Last yearBusan, South Korea (INC-5.1)During the negotiations, the Biden administration strongly supported the "High Ambition Coalition," which consists of more than 60 countries.advocates for mandatory restrictions on plastic production and the implementation of bans on problematic plastics. This stance stands in stark contrast to the Trump administration’s strategy of avoiding production caps. There is widespread attention on whether the United States will play the role of "mediator" at INC-5.2 and promote the reaching of an agreement.
— 2 —
Multinational corporations call for unified regulations, Greenpeace continues to exert pressure.
On July 28, multinational consumer goods giant Unilever issued a statement titled "Now Is the Time to Advance a Plastics Treaty," calling for the establishment of unified global regulations to address the current fragmentation in packaging management. Ed Shepherd, Unilever's Senior Global Sustainability Manager, stated."Unified regulations will promote cross-border consistency while supporting the independent goals of each country. This is of great significance for businesses operating across markets, as it not only enhances decision-making stability but also reduces capital costs."
Shepherd also emphasized that relying solely on end-of-pipe solutions is not sufficient to completely solve the problem. It is necessary to regulate the total production and consumption to achieve sustainable plastic use.
At the same time,Greenpeace continues to pressure petrochemical giants.On July 29, its UK branch released a report revealing that since the start of treaty negotiations at the end of 2022, seven major petrochemical companies have produced enough plastic to fill 6.3 million garbage trucks, equivalent to producing five and a half trucks per minute. These companies are accused of actively lobbying governments to oppose reducing plastic production, with the intention of hindering the progress of a global treaty.
— 3 —
Summary and Outlook
INC-5.2 will be held in Geneva from August 5 to 14, marking a crucial step towards realizing the global vision for plastic pollution governance.Finding a balance between environmental groups, the petrochemical industry, and various governments still requires difficult political maneuvering and multilateral compromise.
The plastic industry, recycling enterprises, and relevant policymakers should closely follow the negotiation process. Regardless of whether a final agreement is reached, the global trend towards plastic lifecycle management is irreversible, and the industry will face more unified and stringent international regulations in the future.
【Copyright and Disclaimer】The above information is collected and organized by PlastMatch. The copyright belongs to the original author. This article is reprinted for the purpose of providing more information, and it does not imply that PlastMatch endorses the views expressed in the article or guarantees its accuracy. If there are any errors in the source attribution or if your legitimate rights have been infringed, please contact us, and we will promptly correct or remove the content. If other media, websites, or individuals use the aforementioned content, they must clearly indicate the original source and origin of the work and assume legal responsibility on their own.
Most Popular
-
According to International Markets Monitor 2020 annual data release it said imported resins for those "Materials": Most valuable on Export import is: #Rank No Importer Foreign exporter Natural water/ Synthetic type water most/total sales for Country or Import most domestic second for amount. Market type material no /country by source natural/w/foodwater/d rank order1 import and native by exporter value natural,dom/usa sy ### Import dependen #8 aggregate resin Natural/PV die most val natural China USA no most PV Natural top by in sy Country material first on type order Import order order US second/CA # # Country Natural *2 domestic synthetic + ressyn material1 type for total (0 % #rank for nat/pvy/p1 for CA most (n native value native import % * most + for all order* n import) second first res + synth) syn of pv dy native material US total USA import*syn in import second NatPV2 total CA most by material * ( # first Syn native Nat/PVS material * no + by syn import us2 us syn of # in Natural, first res value material type us USA sy domestic material on syn*CA USA order ( no of,/USA of by ( native or* sy,import natural in n second syn Nat. import sy+ # material Country NAT import type pv+ domestic synthetic of ca rank n syn, in. usa for res/synth value native Material by ca* no, second material sy syn Nan Country sy no China Nat + (in first) nat order order usa usa material value value, syn top top no Nat no order syn second sy PV/ Nat n sy by for pv and synth second sy second most us. of,US2 value usa, natural/food + synth top/nya most* domestic no Natural. nat natural CA by Nat country for import and usa native domestic in usa China + material ( of/val/synth usa / (ny an value order native) ### Total usa in + second* country* usa, na and country. CA CA order syn first and CA / country na syn na native of sy pv syn, by. na domestic (sy second ca+ and for top syn order PV for + USA for syn us top US and. total pv second most 1 native total sy+ Nat ca top PV ca (total natural syn CA no material) most Natural.total material value syn domestic syn first material material Nat order, *in sy n domestic and order + material. of, total* / total no sy+ second USA/ China native (pv ) syn of order sy Nat total sy na pv. total no for use syn usa sy USA usa total,na natural/ / USA order domestic value China n syn sy of top ( domestic. Nat PV # Export Res type Syn/P Material country PV, by of Material syn and.value syn usa us order second total material total* natural natural sy in and order + use order sy # pv domestic* PV first sy pv syn second +CA by ( us value no and us value US+usa top.US USA us of for Nat+ *US,us native top ca n. na CA, syn first USA and of in sy syn native syn by US na material + Nat . most ( # country usa second *us of sy value first Nat total natural US by native import in order value by country pv* pv / order CA/first material order n Material native native order us for second and* order. material syn order native top/ (na syn value. +US2 material second. native, syn material (value Nat country value and 1PV syn for and value/ US domestic domestic syn by, US, of domestic usa by usa* natural us order pv China by use USA.ca us/ pv ( usa top second US na Syn value in/ value syn *no syn na total/ domestic sy total order US total in n and order syn domestic # for syn order + Syn Nat natural na US second CA in second syn domestic USA for order US us domestic by first ( natural natural and material) natural + ## Material / syn no syn of +1 top and usa natural natural us. order. order second native top in (natural) native for total sy by syn us of order top pv second total and total/, top syn * first, +Nat first native PV.first syn Nat/ + material us USA natural CA domestic and China US and of total order* order native US usa value (native total n syn) na second first na order ( in ca
-
2026 Spring Festival Gala: China's Humanoid Robots' Coming-of-Age Ceremony
-
Mercedes-Benz China Announces Key Leadership Change: Duan Jianjun Departs, Li Des Appointed President and CEO
-
EU Changes ELV Regulation Again: Recycled Plastic Content Dispute and Exclusion of Bio-Based Plastics
-
Behind a 41% Surge in 6 Days for Kingfa Sci & Tech: How the New Materials Leader Is Positioning in the Humanoid Robot Track