Survey Shows: False Recycled Material Claims Becoming A Means For United Kingdom (UK) Businesses To Evade Plastic Packaging Tax
Fraudulent recycled content claims on imported plastic packaging are undermining the UK's Plastic Packaging Tax (PPT) and threatening the survival of domestic recycling operations, according to a new report from RECOUP, the UK’s plastics recycling charity.

The recent report warns that packaging manufacturers are facing unfair competition from cheaper imports that falsely declare recycled content to avoid the £223.69 per tonne tax. RECOUP surveyed 15 plastic packaging manufacturers, with three reporting direct harm to their operations as a result of fraudulent claims.
The Plastic Packaging Tax, introduced in April 2022, was designed to incentivise the use of recycled material in manufacturing, aiming to stimulate investment in recycling infrastructure and improve plastic waste processing. However, RECOUP argues that weak verification systems are allowing virgin plastic to be sold under false recycled content claims, undermining both the tax and the industry it was meant to support.
The report highlights technically impossible claims as proof of fraud. Stretch film is being marketed with 300 per cent stretchability while claiming high recycled content, a performance only achievable with 100 per cent virgin material, according to RECOUP's analysis.
Industry sources told RECOUP that incorporating 30 per cent recycled content into UK-produced stretch film increases costs by more than 10 per cent, adding several hundred pounds per tonne. Legitimate manufacturers are therefore competing against fraudulent imports that avoid both the tax burden and the technical challenges of using recycled materials.
Steven Morgan, Head of Policy and Infrastructure at RECOUP, said: "The UK imports around half the plastic packaging it places onto the market, and this includes packaging with claims of recycled content."
He warned that false claims, particularly from imported material, could trigger "a collapse of the plastic packaging recycling system in the UK as we know it".
Revenue losses and enforcement gaps
Weak enforcement is also costing HMRC substantial revenue. Plastic Packaging Tax receipts totalled £259 million in 2024-2025, down 3 per cent from the previous year despite rising packaging volumes.
Some manufacturers report paying a premium for packaging marketed as containing 50 per cent recycled content to stay safely above the 30 per cent threshold; however, this material may be virgin plastic disguised as recycled. RECOUP argues that stronger verification would cut these unnecessary costs.
UK recyclers, who typically provide the traceability and regulatory compliance required for food-contact packaging, are losing market share to low-cost imports from East and Southeast Asia and Turkey. These regions benefit from lower operational costs, different regulatory requirements, and, in some cases, questionable labour practices.
Proposed reforms
To restore integrity to the system, RECOUP recommends implementing either a single HMRC-recognised certification scheme or unified verification requirements assessed by accredited third-party auditors. These systems should include on-site audits by qualified staff and recognition of existing international certifications where applicable.
The charity also calls for a clear separation between pre-consumer material and post-consumer waste, developing transparency tools to report fraudulent activity, and aligning verification requirements between mechanical and chemical recycling processes.
RECOUP warns that when pre-consumer waste is excluded from recycled content definitions in 2027, the risk of fraudulent relabelling will increase unless enforcement is strengthened.
Since 2023, several high-profile UK plastic recycling facilities have closed, cutting an estimated 260,000 tonnes per year of recycling capacity in just 18 months. The British Plastics Federation attributes these closures to "extremely challenging market conditions along with delays to legislation".
Fraudulent practices within the UK’s wider packaging recovery note system are estimated to cost businesses and consumers £50 million annually, with companies forced to purchase recycling evidence for packaging that may never be reprocessed. Gaps between customs data and official recycling databases left 43,575 tonnes unaccounted for in 2023 alone.
Without urgent action, the report concludes, the UK risks losing skilled jobs, industrial capacity, and the ability to recycle plastic waste domestically, at a time when more countries are restricting imports of plastic waste.
【Copyright and Disclaimer】The above information is collected and organized by PlastMatch. The copyright belongs to the original author. This article is reprinted for the purpose of providing more information, and it does not imply that PlastMatch endorses the views expressed in the article or guarantees its accuracy. If there are any errors in the source attribution or if your legitimate rights have been infringed, please contact us, and we will promptly correct or remove the content. If other media, websites, or individuals use the aforementioned content, they must clearly indicate the original source and origin of the work and assume legal responsibility on their own.
Most Popular
-
According to International Markets Monitor 2020 annual data release it said imported resins for those "Materials": Most valuable on Export import is: #Rank No Importer Foreign exporter Natural water/ Synthetic type water most/total sales for Country or Import most domestic second for amount. Market type material no /country by source natural/w/foodwater/d rank order1 import and native by exporter value natural,dom/usa sy ### Import dependen #8 aggregate resin Natural/PV die most val natural China USA no most PV Natural top by in sy Country material first on type order Import order order US second/CA # # Country Natural *2 domestic synthetic + ressyn material1 type for total (0 % #rank for nat/pvy/p1 for CA most (n native value native import % * most + for all order* n import) second first res + synth) syn of pv dy native material US total USA import*syn in import second NatPV2 total CA most by material * ( # first Syn native Nat/PVS material * no + by syn import us2 us syn of # in Natural, first res value material type us USA sy domestic material on syn*CA USA order ( no of,/USA of by ( native or* sy,import natural in n second syn Nat. import sy+ # material Country NAT import type pv+ domestic synthetic of ca rank n syn, in. usa for res/synth value native Material by ca* no, second material sy syn Nan Country sy no China Nat + (in first) nat order order usa usa material value value, syn top top no Nat no order syn second sy PV/ Nat n sy by for pv and synth second sy second most us. of,US2 value usa, natural/food + synth top/nya most* domestic no Natural. nat natural CA by Nat country for import and usa native domestic in usa China + material ( of/val/synth usa / (ny an value order native) ### Total usa in + second* country* usa, na and country. CA CA order syn first and CA / country na syn na native of sy pv syn, by. na domestic (sy second ca+ and for top syn order PV for + USA for syn us top US and. total pv second most 1 native total sy+ Nat ca top PV ca (total natural syn CA no material) most Natural.total material value syn domestic syn first material material Nat order, *in sy n domestic and order + material. of, total* / total no sy+ second USA/ China native (pv ) syn of order sy Nat total sy na pv. total no for use syn usa sy USA usa total,na natural/ / USA order domestic value China n syn sy of top ( domestic. Nat PV # Export Res type Syn/P Material country PV, by of Material syn and.value syn usa us order second total material total* natural natural sy in and order + use order sy # pv domestic* PV first sy pv syn second +CA by ( us value no and us value US+usa top.US USA us of for Nat+ *US,us native top ca n. na CA, syn first USA and of in sy syn native syn by US na material + Nat . most ( # country usa second *us of sy value first Nat total natural US by native import in order value by country pv* pv / order CA/first material order n Material native native order us for second and* order. material syn order native top/ (na syn value. +US2 material second. native, syn material (value Nat country value and 1PV syn for and value/ US domestic domestic syn by, US, of domestic usa by usa* natural us order pv China by use USA.ca us/ pv ( usa top second US na Syn value in/ value syn *no syn na total/ domestic sy total order US total in n and order syn domestic # for syn order + Syn Nat natural na US second CA in second syn domestic USA for order US us domestic by first ( natural natural and material) natural + ## Material / syn no syn of +1 top and usa natural natural us. order. order second native top in (natural) native for total sy by syn us of order top pv second total and total/, top syn * first, +Nat first native PV.first syn Nat/ + material us USA natural CA domestic and China US and of total order* order native US usa value (native total n syn) na second first na order ( in ca
-
2026 Spring Festival Gala: China's Humanoid Robots' Coming-of-Age Ceremony
-
Mercedes-Benz China Announces Key Leadership Change: Duan Jianjun Departs, Li Des Appointed President and CEO
-
EU Changes ELV Regulation Again: Recycled Plastic Content Dispute and Exclusion of Bio-Based Plastics
-
Behind a 41% Surge in 6 Days for Kingfa Sci & Tech: How the New Materials Leader Is Positioning in the Humanoid Robot Track