New Developments in Plastic Treaty Negotiations: Focus on Global Ban and Financial Support for Low-Income Countries
Chinasuzhijie learned that during the global plastics treaty negotiations held in Geneva, member states engaged in consultations within the framework of the so-called "contact groups." During the second phase of the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2), led by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), these contact groups discussed the various provisions of the proposed legally binding agreement. INC-5.2 is scheduled to hold a meeting on August 14, and UNEP hopes that during this period, all stakeholders can bridge differences and reach a consensus on a global treaty to address plastic waste.

Disagreements over the global ban on harmful plastic products
In the first contact group, intense debates were held around Article 3, which involves plastic products and chemicals of concern. Switzerland and Mexico submitted a Conference Room Paper (CRP) calling for a global ban on the trade of harmful plastic products and chemicals of concern. According to the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA), the paper "received widespread support, with 77 countries having signed in agreement." However, other countries attempted to weaken Article 3, arguing that the provision could threaten national economic development. Additionally, GAIA noted that these countries claimed chemical issues are already covered by other environmental conventions and that related matters should be addressed in subsequent meetings after the convention is signed.
Other contact group meetings focused on Articles 8 and 11, involving energy recovery through incineration. From GAIA’s perspective, this essentially transforms one type of plastic pollution into another; Article 11 requires high-income countries and plastic-producing countries to provide mandatory financial support to low-income countries that may find it difficult to meet the agreement’s requirements.
The United States' position has undergone a 180-degree turnaround.
The market generally believes that since the last meeting held in Busan, South Korea in November-December 2024, the United States has undergone a significant shift in its position. Prior to the Busan meeting, the Biden administration announced in August 2024 that it would support reducing the production of new plastics. However, according to Reuters, this stance is no longer being mentioned.
According to exclusive information from the media, the United States has sent letters to at least a few countries, urging them to oppose a global treaty that includes targets for limiting plastic production and chemical additives in plastics. This puts the United States at odds with more than 100 countries, including the European Union, that support some form of production cap.
The core objective of the Disarmament Convention
According to the proposed resolution it has seen, Reuters also reported that the United States is attempting to modify the goals of the draft convention. Specifically, it aims to remove the reference to an "agreed approach covering the full lifecycle of plastics" from the expression "reducing plastic pollution." GAIA wrote that this expression stems from the consensus reached when negotiations for the plastic convention began, which stated that this legally binding instrument should cover the entire lifecycle of plastics, from extraction to disposal, as plastics cause pollution at every stage of their existence.
The United States is aligned with the industry position.
The production cap has undoubtedly faced opposition from the plastics industry and major global plastic-producing countries. At the beginning of the INC-5.2 meeting, Matt Seaholm, President and CEO of the Plastics Industry Association of the United States, stated in a written statement that the advancement of a global agreement "must focus on expanding modern recycling systems, accelerating the development of new technologies, and supporting private sector solutions. Our industry is ready to take a leading role and is committed to being part of practical and viable solutions."
【Copyright and Disclaimer】This article is the property of PlastMatch. For business cooperation, media interviews, article reprints, or suggestions, please call the PlastMatch customer service hotline at +86-18030158354 or via email at service@zhuansushijie.com. The information and data provided by PlastMatch are for reference only and do not constitute direct advice for client decision-making. Any decisions made by clients based on such information and data, and all resulting direct or indirect losses and legal consequences, shall be borne by the clients themselves and are unrelated to PlastMatch. Unauthorized reprinting is strictly prohibited.
Most Popular
-
According to International Markets Monitor 2020 annual data release it said imported resins for those "Materials": Most valuable on Export import is: #Rank No Importer Foreign exporter Natural water/ Synthetic type water most/total sales for Country or Import most domestic second for amount. Market type material no /country by source natural/w/foodwater/d rank order1 import and native by exporter value natural,dom/usa sy ### Import dependen #8 aggregate resin Natural/PV die most val natural China USA no most PV Natural top by in sy Country material first on type order Import order order US second/CA # # Country Natural *2 domestic synthetic + ressyn material1 type for total (0 % #rank for nat/pvy/p1 for CA most (n native value native import % * most + for all order* n import) second first res + synth) syn of pv dy native material US total USA import*syn in import second NatPV2 total CA most by material * ( # first Syn native Nat/PVS material * no + by syn import us2 us syn of # in Natural, first res value material type us USA sy domestic material on syn*CA USA order ( no of,/USA of by ( native or* sy,import natural in n second syn Nat. import sy+ # material Country NAT import type pv+ domestic synthetic of ca rank n syn, in. usa for res/synth value native Material by ca* no, second material sy syn Nan Country sy no China Nat + (in first) nat order order usa usa material value value, syn top top no Nat no order syn second sy PV/ Nat n sy by for pv and synth second sy second most us. of,US2 value usa, natural/food + synth top/nya most* domestic no Natural. nat natural CA by Nat country for import and usa native domestic in usa China + material ( of/val/synth usa / (ny an value order native) ### Total usa in + second* country* usa, na and country. CA CA order syn first and CA / country na syn na native of sy pv syn, by. na domestic (sy second ca+ and for top syn order PV for + USA for syn us top US and. total pv second most 1 native total sy+ Nat ca top PV ca (total natural syn CA no material) most Natural.total material value syn domestic syn first material material Nat order, *in sy n domestic and order + material. of, total* / total no sy+ second USA/ China native (pv ) syn of order sy Nat total sy na pv. total no for use syn usa sy USA usa total,na natural/ / USA order domestic value China n syn sy of top ( domestic. Nat PV # Export Res type Syn/P Material country PV, by of Material syn and.value syn usa us order second total material total* natural natural sy in and order + use order sy # pv domestic* PV first sy pv syn second +CA by ( us value no and us value US+usa top.US USA us of for Nat+ *US,us native top ca n. na CA, syn first USA and of in sy syn native syn by US na material + Nat . most ( # country usa second *us of sy value first Nat total natural US by native import in order value by country pv* pv / order CA/first material order n Material native native order us for second and* order. material syn order native top/ (na syn value. +US2 material second. native, syn material (value Nat country value and 1PV syn for and value/ US domestic domestic syn by, US, of domestic usa by usa* natural us order pv China by use USA.ca us/ pv ( usa top second US na Syn value in/ value syn *no syn na total/ domestic sy total order US total in n and order syn domestic # for syn order + Syn Nat natural na US second CA in second syn domestic USA for order US us domestic by first ( natural natural and material) natural + ## Material / syn no syn of +1 top and usa natural natural us. order. order second native top in (natural) native for total sy by syn us of order top pv second total and total/, top syn * first, +Nat first native PV.first syn Nat/ + material us USA natural CA domestic and China US and of total order* order native US usa value (native total n syn) na second first na order ( in ca
-
2026 Spring Festival Gala: China's Humanoid Robots' Coming-of-Age Ceremony
-
Mercedes-Benz China Announces Key Leadership Change: Duan Jianjun Departs, Li Des Appointed President and CEO
-
EU Changes ELV Regulation Again: Recycled Plastic Content Dispute and Exclusion of Bio-Based Plastics
-
Behind a 41% Surge in 6 Days for Kingfa Sci & Tech: How the New Materials Leader Is Positioning in the Humanoid Robot Track