H1 Energy Storage Bidding Surges by 150%, Central and State-Owned Enterprises Lead 170GWh Mega Orders
In the first half of this year, the bidding for energy storage projects continued to grow at a high rate.
Data shows that from January to June this year, the total publicly traceable bidding and procurement scale in the domestic energy storage market exceeded 170 GWh, a 1.5-fold increase compared to over 68 GWh in the same period last year. This includes energy storage systems, energy storage cells, and EPC general contracting with equipment.
From the perspective of the technical approachLithium iron phosphate (LFP) energy storage remains the mainstream technological route with the largest number and scale of projects. Its share of procurement demand exceeds 92%, especially as all major central and state-owned enterprise centralized procurement projects are targeted at lithium battery energy storage systems. In addition, hybrid energy storage accounts for a relatively high proportion, mainly in the form of technological combinations such as "LFP + flow battery/sodium-ion/flywheel, etc."
01. Central and state-owned enterprises lead energy storage tender demand, with CRRC Zhuzhou Institute, Xinyuan Zhichu, and HyperStrong ranking top three in awarded capacity.
In the first half of the year, among the more than 170 GWh of energy storage procurement orders, the total awarded capacity of central state-owned enterprise (SOE) energy storage projects reached 90 GWh, accounting for approximately 52%. State-owned enterprises (SOEs at the local level) announced over 40 GWh, nearly 24% of the total. Among them, China Energy Engineering Corporation (CEEC) led with over 26 GWh in energy storage tendered capacity; China Power Construction Group, China National Nuclear Corporation, China Huadian Corporation, and China General Nuclear Power Group each secured more than 10 GWh in procurement and bidding scale.
Public information shows that among the procurement and bidding projects implemented in the first half of the year, a single projectThe largest one is the China Energy Engineering Group's 25GWh lithium iron phosphate battery energy storage system procurement project.Three bidding sections attracted a total of 70 companies to participate. The bid opening results show that for energy storage systems of 4 hours (10GWh), 2 hours (12GWh), and 1 hour (3GWh), the corresponding average bids are as follows:0.425 RMB/Wh, 0.465 RMB/Wh, 0.786 RMB/WhThe project has not yet announced the winning candidates.
Secondly, the project ranked second in scale and with the highest number of bidding companies isChina Power Construction 16GWh Energy Storage System Centralized ProcurementA total of 76 companies participated, with 27 companies shortlisted. The project requires the use of lithium iron phosphate battery cells with a nominal capacity of ≥280Ah. The bid prices of the shortlisted companies ranged from 0.442 RMB/Wh to 0.528 RMB/Wh, with an average price of0.469 RMB/WhThe shortlisted suppliers include TCC, Sungrow, Shuangdeng Group, CRRC Zhuzhou Institute, Chenergy, Phylion Battery, Envision Energy, REPT BATTERO, Trina Storage, Ganfeng Lithium, etc.
In addition, several large-scale procurement projects have been implemented, including China National Nuclear Huineng and Xinhua Hydropower's 12GWh energy storage system procurement, China General Nuclear Power New Energy's 10.5GWh energy storage system framework procurement, and China Huadian Corporation's 6GWh lithium iron phosphate energy storage system framework procurement.
It is worth mentioning thatThe single energy storage project with the largest bid amount.The 1GW/6GWh power-side energy storage project EPC tender in Chayouzhongqi, Ulanqab City (excluding collective procurement), with a total bid amount between 6.25 billion and 6.27 billion yuan.
From the bid opening resultsAccording to comprehensive data from various institutions, among lithium battery energy storage system suppliers,CRRC Zhuzhou InstituteRanked first with a total winning bid of 5.8 GWh.Xinyuan Zhichu, Haibo SichuangRanked second and third with winning bids of 3.5GWh and 3.3GWh, respectively, BYD, East Group, Nari Jibao, Ronghe Yuanchu, Kelu Electronics, and Sungrow all secured bids exceeding 1GWh. Additionally, it is reported that Sungrow has increased its investment in the domestic market since last year and has become the manufacturer with the most winning bids in large-scale procurement projects this year.
Price aspectIn the first half of this year, the winning bid price trend for energy storage systems showed a slower decline compared to last year, and the range of winning bid prices gradually narrowed.The average winning bid price for 2-hour energy storage systems is 0.558 yuan/Wh, down 27% year-on-year.It is worth mentioning that the average winning bid price steadily declined in the first five months, but showed a month-on-month rebound in June, which may be related to fewer samples and the inclusion of network construction-type energy storage projects.The average bid price for a 4-hour energy storage system is 0.448 yuan/Wh, a year-on-year decrease of 69%.
Among them, the lowest price for the energy storage system was reported by Shandong Electric Power Times in the 1GWh DC-side energy storage system procurement project of Xin Fengguang Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., adopting the lithium iron phosphate technology route.The unit price is 0.368 yuan/Wh.The lowest bid price for the 4-hour energy storage system appeared in Lot 4 of the 6 GWh lithium iron phosphate electrochemical energy storage system procurement project by Xinjiang Huadian, with Tebian Electric Apparatus winning the bid at...0.405 yuan/WhThe price is expected to win the bid.

The average price of energy storage cells in the first half of the year is 0.289 yuan/Wh.
Energy storage cellsThe latest data shows that the battery cell price range in the first half of this year is 0.26 RMB/Wh to 0.38 RMB/Wh, with an average price of0.289 RMB/Wh.
According to public reports, major energy storage cell centralized procurement/framework procurement projects mainly come from China Power Construction's 1GWh cell centralized procurement, China Storage Technology's 6GWh cell framework procurement, and New Sunshine's 1GWh energy storage cell centralized procurement. In addition, China Electric Equipment Group also announced a cell centralized procurement project with a scale of 7.248GWh in early June, with cell specifications including four types: 50Ah, 100Ah, 280Ah, and 314Ah.The procurement volume of 314Ah cells is 7.2GWh, accounting for 99.34% of the total cell procurement volume for the project.
In the New Fengguang 1GWh energy storage cell centralized procurement project, nine companies including Penghui Energy, EVE Energy, Sunwoda, CALB, Haichen Energy Storage, Lishen (Qingdao), CATL, Dejin New Energy, and Ruiyuan Electric have been shortlisted.The quoted price ranged from 0.26 RMB/Wh to 0.34 RMB/Wh, with an average quoted price of 0.279 RMB/Wh. Penghui Energy became the first winning candidate for this bidding project with the lowest quoted price of 0.26 RMB/Wh.
In the China Power Construction 1GWh cell centralized procurement project, two packages of 280Ah and 314Ah were procured with 500MWh each. The nine winning companies are Trina Storage, Lishen (Qingdao), Ganfeng Lithium, Ruipu Lanjun, Haichen Storage, Chneng New Energy, EVE Energy, Envision Power, and CALB.
The 8 shortlisted candidates for the 6GWh cell frame procurement project by Zhongchuang Technology, after deduplication, are EVE Energy, REPT Battero, Sunwoda Electric Vehicle Battery, CALB, Chenergy, Ganfeng Lithium, Envision AESC, and Desay Battery. The bid price range for the shortlisted companies is 0.27-0.38 yuan/Wh, with an average price of.0.276 yuan/Wh.
It is worth mentioning that, at present, the recent "rebound" in lithium carbonate prices, coupled with the fact that the energy storage business model is facing a true test of marketization, and with policies encouraging technological innovation and improvement of service quality to promote high-quality industry development, multiple factors are driving a reshaping of the energy storage market landscape. The price of energy storage cells is expected to break free from the "low-price trap" seen since last year and move toward a more stable price range.
【Copyright and Disclaimer】The above information is collected and organized by PlastMatch. The copyright belongs to the original author. This article is reprinted for the purpose of providing more information, and it does not imply that PlastMatch endorses the views expressed in the article or guarantees its accuracy. If there are any errors in the source attribution or if your legitimate rights have been infringed, please contact us, and we will promptly correct or remove the content. If other media, websites, or individuals use the aforementioned content, they must clearly indicate the original source and origin of the work and assume legal responsibility on their own.
Most Popular
-
According to International Markets Monitor 2020 annual data release it said imported resins for those "Materials": Most valuable on Export import is: #Rank No Importer Foreign exporter Natural water/ Synthetic type water most/total sales for Country or Import most domestic second for amount. Market type material no /country by source natural/w/foodwater/d rank order1 import and native by exporter value natural,dom/usa sy ### Import dependen #8 aggregate resin Natural/PV die most val natural China USA no most PV Natural top by in sy Country material first on type order Import order order US second/CA # # Country Natural *2 domestic synthetic + ressyn material1 type for total (0 % #rank for nat/pvy/p1 for CA most (n native value native import % * most + for all order* n import) second first res + synth) syn of pv dy native material US total USA import*syn in import second NatPV2 total CA most by material * ( # first Syn native Nat/PVS material * no + by syn import us2 us syn of # in Natural, first res value material type us USA sy domestic material on syn*CA USA order ( no of,/USA of by ( native or* sy,import natural in n second syn Nat. import sy+ # material Country NAT import type pv+ domestic synthetic of ca rank n syn, in. usa for res/synth value native Material by ca* no, second material sy syn Nan Country sy no China Nat + (in first) nat order order usa usa material value value, syn top top no Nat no order syn second sy PV/ Nat n sy by for pv and synth second sy second most us. of,US2 value usa, natural/food + synth top/nya most* domestic no Natural. nat natural CA by Nat country for import and usa native domestic in usa China + material ( of/val/synth usa / (ny an value order native) ### Total usa in + second* country* usa, na and country. CA CA order syn first and CA / country na syn na native of sy pv syn, by. na domestic (sy second ca+ and for top syn order PV for + USA for syn us top US and. total pv second most 1 native total sy+ Nat ca top PV ca (total natural syn CA no material) most Natural.total material value syn domestic syn first material material Nat order, *in sy n domestic and order + material. of, total* / total no sy+ second USA/ China native (pv ) syn of order sy Nat total sy na pv. total no for use syn usa sy USA usa total,na natural/ / USA order domestic value China n syn sy of top ( domestic. Nat PV # Export Res type Syn/P Material country PV, by of Material syn and.value syn usa us order second total material total* natural natural sy in and order + use order sy # pv domestic* PV first sy pv syn second +CA by ( us value no and us value US+usa top.US USA us of for Nat+ *US,us native top ca n. na CA, syn first USA and of in sy syn native syn by US na material + Nat . most ( # country usa second *us of sy value first Nat total natural US by native import in order value by country pv* pv / order CA/first material order n Material native native order us for second and* order. material syn order native top/ (na syn value. +US2 material second. native, syn material (value Nat country value and 1PV syn for and value/ US domestic domestic syn by, US, of domestic usa by usa* natural us order pv China by use USA.ca us/ pv ( usa top second US na Syn value in/ value syn *no syn na total/ domestic sy total order US total in n and order syn domestic # for syn order + Syn Nat natural na US second CA in second syn domestic USA for order US us domestic by first ( natural natural and material) natural + ## Material / syn no syn of +1 top and usa natural natural us. order. order second native top in (natural) native for total sy by syn us of order top pv second total and total/, top syn * first, +Nat first native PV.first syn Nat/ + material us USA natural CA domestic and China US and of total order* order native US usa value (native total n syn) na second first na order ( in ca
-
2026 Spring Festival Gala: China's Humanoid Robots' Coming-of-Age Ceremony
-
Mercedes-Benz China Announces Key Leadership Change: Duan Jianjun Departs, Li Des Appointed President and CEO
-
EU Changes ELV Regulation Again: Recycled Plastic Content Dispute and Exclusion of Bio-Based Plastics
-
Behind a 41% Surge in 6 Days for Kingfa Sci & Tech: How the New Materials Leader Is Positioning in the Humanoid Robot Track