Energy storage projects "collectively stranded," industry reshuffle accelerates!
Recently, a report released by the market analysis organization Clean Energy Associates (CEA) shows that the U.S. energy storage manufacturing industry is experiencing a "cold wave" impact due to new tariffs and policy adjustments.

The report points out that the United States has implemented multiple new tariffs on energy storage batteries and components, directly resulting in a combined impact on three American companies of approximately...21GWhBattery storage capacity was canceled this year; an additional five companies postponed a total of over...19GWhThe plan for production capacity implementation. The report specifically emphasizes that,The main reason is the United States' high dependence on Chinese battery materials (accounting for over 60%).
01
Energy storage projects are collectively experiencing an "adjustment wave."
In fact, not only in the United States, but globally, after several years of rapid development, the energy storage industry has seen its market share quietly concentrate towards leading quality enterprises following several rounds of eliminations. China is no exception, with leading lithium battery companies like CATL, EVE Energy, Sunwoda, and Desay Battery nearing full production capacity, while small and medium-sized enterprises in the energy storage supply chain, lacking core competitiveness and policy adaptation capabilities, are undergoing a new round of market reshuffling.
Recently, there has been a lot of attention on two solid-state battery projects that were terminated due to the "explosion" of a partner. This news has been widely discussed in the industry. Gaoneng Times had its controlling shareholder's shares frozen, resulting in Anfu Technology.The 300MWh sulfide all-solid-state battery pilot project and the solid-state battery cooperation plan between Lihu Co., Ltd. and High Energy Era have been announced to be terminated.
Among them, it is planned to invest 50 million yuan to build a 300MWh sulfide all-solid-state battery pilot production line project.Plans to complete the delivery of home energy storage products by the end of 2027 and the delivery of large-scale energy storage equipment by the end of 2030.However,The project was terminated quietly just four months after signing, still in its initial stage, and even before the first round of investment was completed.
This is not an isolated case. Recently, many high-profile energy storage "star projects" have been reported to be adjusted, delayed, or terminated one after another. There have even been extreme cases where an energy storage project filing was withdrawn just one week after being registered.
According to Battery China, recently, the leading cathode material company...Wanrun New EnergyIt announced that as early as July 2023, it had signed a "Letter of Intent for Investment" with the Wuhan Chemical Industry Park Management Committee, proposing to invest approximately 5 billion RMB to build an integrated industrial base. This base would include the research and mass production of key materials such as lithium-ion batteries, sodium-ion batteries, solid-state batteries, and hydrogen storage. However, as of today, the two-year period has ended, and its official announcement shows that the project...Up to now, it has not been carried out, and there are no further plans to proceed. After mutual communication and confirmation, it will not be renewed, and the agreement will be automatically terminated.
The original vision of the project was grand, covering multiple cutting-edge technology directions, but ultimately it "Make a prudent decision based on the market environment, the company's development strategy, and the actual situation."——Terminate the investment project."
According to public information, since the beginning of this year, more than 15 energy storage capacity and power station projects have been postponed, terminated, or adjusted. The capacity-related projects involve technologies such as lithium batteries, sodium batteries, solid-state batteries, energy storage inverters, and system integration.
Projects that are relatively well-known and have a high level of public attention, such asHaisidaIn June, the "30GWh Sodium-ion and Lithium-ion Battery and System Production Base Project" with an investment of 10.2 billion yuan was terminated.Changying PrecisionThe "Changzhou Power and Energy Storage Battery Components Project" has been postponed for two years; in April,Homae Co., Ltd.Announce the proposed termination of the 88.77 million yuan energy storage inverter industrialization project.GaoLan CorporationDecide to terminate the investment in the "All-Scenario Thermal Management R&D and High-end Manufacturing Project for Energy Storage" worth 1 billion yuan.Kexin TechnologyAnnounced the delay of its 360 million RMB "Energy Storage Lithium Battery System R&D and Industrialization Project"...
From the perspective of project construction entitiesCross-industry enterprises and industrial chain extension projects have seen significant adjustments, and some companies deeply engaged in the energy storage sector have also undergone strategic adjustments. It is regrettable that although many projects received considerable attention at the initial stage, they eventually exited quietly.Many projects have even come to a standstill at a "zero progress" status, with no implementation or funding input.
02
The Story Behind the Project's Failure
A series of energy storage projects collectively entering an "adjustment wave" is the result of multiple factors combined. It also reflects that the entire industry is gradually shifting from "wild expansion" to a rational development phase centered on technological iteration, market differentiation, and policy restructuring.
The most direct reason is the impact of policy changes.The "Document No. 136" removes the mandatory reserve requirement, accelerates the construction of the electricity spot market, and promotes high-quality development of the industry through a market-based pricing mechanism.The demand for energy storage is shifting to an endogenous market-driven force.This has caused companies that previously relied on policy incentives to blindly expand capacity to lower their expectations for future market demand. They find it difficult to calculate the return period of projects and are hesitant to proceed with projects rashly. For example, the adjustments in the aforementioned energy storage projects of Wanrun New Energy and Haishida have all mentioned this.Changes in the macro market environment.
Furthermore, the pressure brought by the rapid iteration of new technologies.Energy storage products are rapidly iterating from raw materials, manufacturing processes, battery technology to system integration.For example, taking energy storage cells,The 314Ah energy storage dedicated cell has just gained a foothold, and the development and mass production of the next generation 500Ah+ larger capacity cells are already in full swing. Some companies, due to insufficient research and development investment, find their originally planned expansion products are no longer able to meet market demand, leading them to reassess their technological routes to adjust project construction. For example, the delay of Kexin Technology's "Energy Storage Lithium Battery System R&D and Industrialization Project" in April this year.Technology "outdated"This is one of the important reasons.
Third, project financing has become more difficult, and companies are becoming cautious.The current energy storage industry is stabilizing, and companies' financing channels are narrowing. The energy storage market, which attracted various capital inflows over the past few years, has noticeably cooled in the primary market in recent years. Fundraising cycles have lengthened, and it has become difficult to secure funds for project advancement. Data shows that in 2024, the primary market financing amount for China's new energy industry decreased by 30% year-on-year. For companies involved in energy storage, the tightening financing environment and cash flow pressures have led them to return to rationality.
It is not difficult to see that the current energy storage industry is still accelerating its "reshuffling," driving a reconstruction of the energy storage market structure. In the short term, the "collective halt" of energy storage projects may affect industry confidence, but the clearing out of outdated production capacity will further promote the industry towards a healthier and more rational development. At the same time, this serves as a warning to cross-industry enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises that lack core competitiveness, advising them to avoid blindly following trends and to be more cautious in cross-industry ventures.
【Copyright and Disclaimer】The above information is collected and organized by PlastMatch. The copyright belongs to the original author. This article is reprinted for the purpose of providing more information, and it does not imply that PlastMatch endorses the views expressed in the article or guarantees its accuracy. If there are any errors in the source attribution or if your legitimate rights have been infringed, please contact us, and we will promptly correct or remove the content. If other media, websites, or individuals use the aforementioned content, they must clearly indicate the original source and origin of the work and assume legal responsibility on their own.
Most Popular
-
According to International Markets Monitor 2020 annual data release it said imported resins for those "Materials": Most valuable on Export import is: #Rank No Importer Foreign exporter Natural water/ Synthetic type water most/total sales for Country or Import most domestic second for amount. Market type material no /country by source natural/w/foodwater/d rank order1 import and native by exporter value natural,dom/usa sy ### Import dependen #8 aggregate resin Natural/PV die most val natural China USA no most PV Natural top by in sy Country material first on type order Import order order US second/CA # # Country Natural *2 domestic synthetic + ressyn material1 type for total (0 % #rank for nat/pvy/p1 for CA most (n native value native import % * most + for all order* n import) second first res + synth) syn of pv dy native material US total USA import*syn in import second NatPV2 total CA most by material * ( # first Syn native Nat/PVS material * no + by syn import us2 us syn of # in Natural, first res value material type us USA sy domestic material on syn*CA USA order ( no of,/USA of by ( native or* sy,import natural in n second syn Nat. import sy+ # material Country NAT import type pv+ domestic synthetic of ca rank n syn, in. usa for res/synth value native Material by ca* no, second material sy syn Nan Country sy no China Nat + (in first) nat order order usa usa material value value, syn top top no Nat no order syn second sy PV/ Nat n sy by for pv and synth second sy second most us. of,US2 value usa, natural/food + synth top/nya most* domestic no Natural. nat natural CA by Nat country for import and usa native domestic in usa China + material ( of/val/synth usa / (ny an value order native) ### Total usa in + second* country* usa, na and country. CA CA order syn first and CA / country na syn na native of sy pv syn, by. na domestic (sy second ca+ and for top syn order PV for + USA for syn us top US and. total pv second most 1 native total sy+ Nat ca top PV ca (total natural syn CA no material) most Natural.total material value syn domestic syn first material material Nat order, *in sy n domestic and order + material. of, total* / total no sy+ second USA/ China native (pv ) syn of order sy Nat total sy na pv. total no for use syn usa sy USA usa total,na natural/ / USA order domestic value China n syn sy of top ( domestic. Nat PV # Export Res type Syn/P Material country PV, by of Material syn and.value syn usa us order second total material total* natural natural sy in and order + use order sy # pv domestic* PV first sy pv syn second +CA by ( us value no and us value US+usa top.US USA us of for Nat+ *US,us native top ca n. na CA, syn first USA and of in sy syn native syn by US na material + Nat . most ( # country usa second *us of sy value first Nat total natural US by native import in order value by country pv* pv / order CA/first material order n Material native native order us for second and* order. material syn order native top/ (na syn value. +US2 material second. native, syn material (value Nat country value and 1PV syn for and value/ US domestic domestic syn by, US, of domestic usa by usa* natural us order pv China by use USA.ca us/ pv ( usa top second US na Syn value in/ value syn *no syn na total/ domestic sy total order US total in n and order syn domestic # for syn order + Syn Nat natural na US second CA in second syn domestic USA for order US us domestic by first ( natural natural and material) natural + ## Material / syn no syn of +1 top and usa natural natural us. order. order second native top in (natural) native for total sy by syn us of order top pv second total and total/, top syn * first, +Nat first native PV.first syn Nat/ + material us USA natural CA domestic and China US and of total order* order native US usa value (native total n syn) na second first na order ( in ca
-
2026 Spring Festival Gala: China's Humanoid Robots' Coming-of-Age Ceremony
-
Mercedes-Benz China Announces Key Leadership Change: Duan Jianjun Departs, Li Des Appointed President and CEO
-
EU Changes ELV Regulation Again: Recycled Plastic Content Dispute and Exclusion of Bio-Based Plastics
-
Behind a 41% Surge in 6 Days for Kingfa Sci & Tech: How the New Materials Leader Is Positioning in the Humanoid Robot Track