1% electrification rate alarm: Toyota's $104 Billion Acquisition of Toyota Industries, Is It a Breakthrough or a Desperate Gamble?
In October 2025, Toyota Motor Corporation announced approximately2.2Trillion yenAcquired all shares of the group-related company Toyota Industries Corporation for approximately RMB 104 billion in cash and facilitated its delisting.

Source of image: Auto Business Review
Toyota's acquisition of Toyota Industries this time has set a record in Toyota's internal consolidation history and is also an ambitious privatization case in the Japanese corporate world. More significantly, this acquisition constitutes a dramatic reversal: Toyota Industries, as the "parent" and major shareholder of Toyota, has ultimately been fully integrated by the "subsidiary" it spun off.
This event marks a profound transformation in Japan's traditional corporate governance model and reveals Toyota's strategic self-reinvention driven by the dual forces of electrification transition and capital market demands.
Cross-shareholding becomes a "burden," deeply trapped in a profit dilemma and unable to extricate itself.
The history of Toyota Industries can be traced back to 1926, when Sakichi Toyoda founded the "Toyoda Automatic Loom Works" in Aichi Prefecture, primarily engaged in the manufacture of textile machinery.
In 1933, his son Kiichiro Toyoda established the automobile department within Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, marking the beginning of Toyota's automotive business. For a long time, Toyota Industries has been a key upstream supplier for Toyota Motor Corporation, producing engines, air conditioning compressors, drive motors, forklifts, and textile machinery.
As of the fiscal year 2024, Toyota Motor holds approximately...24% stakeToyota Industries, on the other hand, holds about 9% of the shares of Toyota Motor Corporation.
This cross-shareholding relationship was once a symbol of the "Toyota Group" and is also typical of Japan's "Keiretsu" system: using family ties to build a stable network through mutual shareholding, resisting external capital invasion, and maintaining long-term stability of the supply chain.
However, this former advantage is increasingly seen as an "inefficient legacy" in today's rapidly changing automotive industry. The reason is that cross-shareholdings occupy a large amount of capital, resulting in generally low returns for corporate shareholders, and also weaken the independence of the board of directors and the function of market supervision.
Behind Toyota's aggressive reforms this time is a harsh financial reality. In the 2025 fiscal year, Toyota's net profit is expected to plummet by 44% to 2.66 trillion yen. This is no longer a slide, but a vertical dive.
Toyota attributes its difficulties to external factors: tariffs imposed by the U.S. government on Japanese cars have reduced Toyota's operating profit by 1.4 trillion yen this fiscal year, and the appreciation of the yen has further decreased its profit by 725 billion yen. However, these explanations hardly conceal deeper issues: Toyota's sluggish transition to electrification has severely undermined its competitiveness.
Market data shows that in the fiscal year 2024, Toyota's electric vehicle sales accounted for only 1% globally, far below competitors like Volkswagen and General Motors, which have electrification rates exceeding 15%. While Tesla and BYD are making rapid progress in the electric vehicle sector, Toyota is still lingering in the comfort zone of hybrid technology.
Toyota's predicament represents the general challenges faced by the Japanese automotive industry. Japan was the first major automotive country to be shocked by Tesla. In 2020, after engineers organized by Nikkei Inc. disassembled a Tesla Model 3, they marveled, "We cannot do it."
02 Accelerate upstream! Toyota's electric vehicles break through and speed up.
Toyota's acquisition this time is not merely an equity transaction; it is essentially a strategic adaptation under the pressure of industrial transformation.
In the era of traditional fuel vehicles, a loose supply system could ensure cost and stability; however, in the era of electric vehicles, core technologies are concentrated in areas such as electric drive, batteries, inverters, and control chips.Vertical integration becomes the key to efficiency.Toyota Industries holds mastery over these critical segments. Its electric drive and compressor systems are applied in Toyota's hybrid and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, serving as the core of thermal management and energy efficiency; its semiconductors and electronic control components provide chips and control modules for Toyota's onboard systems.
After the acquisition, Toyota will directly control the upstream manufacturing segment, enhancing supply chain transparency and production efficiency. A person close to Toyota's supply chain stated, "During the electric vehicle transition period, Toyota can no longer allow these core technologies to remain in the hands of a 'relatively independent' subsidiary. Integrating Toyota Industries is a necessary step for the group to maintain its competitiveness."
Facing rapid integration in electrification and intelligence by competitors such as Tesla and BYD, Toyota is reshaping its own industry chain with a similar vertical integration model. This acquisition will further streamline the processes of technology research and development, manufacturing, and resource allocation, forming a full-chain collaborative mechanism from chips to complete vehicles.
03 Global Automakers' Diverse Transformation Paths: China's Overseas Expansion, Europe's Acceleration, Japan's Quest for Change
Toyota's radical restructuring is just a microcosm of the global automotive industry's transformation wave. Different countries and companies are choosing different transformation paths based on their own circumstances.
Chinese car companies Choose to accelerate transformation through "going abroad," evolving from an early single trade model to a new stage of building factories overseas, joint ventures and cooperation, and reverse technology export. Southeast Asia is the most concentrated region, with Thailand being particularly prominent.
On one hand, mainstream car manufacturers such as BYD, Chery, and Changan are investing in building factories in multiple locations worldwide, advancing from mere vehicle exports to a new stage of "localized production + globalized service." On the other hand, Chinese car companies are continuously enhancing their brand value. For instance, BYD's performance in the global automotive market has become increasingly impressive. Not only has it ranked among the top ten global automotive brands for three consecutive years, but it also ranked sixth on the "2025 Kantar BrandZ Most Valuable Global Brands" list released on May 15, 2025, with a brand value of $14.4 billion.

Source: Y Car Entertainment
The first half of 2025,European carsThe electrification transformation of the market is showing strong momentum. According to mid-year reports released by mainstream automakers such as Volkswagen, Renault, and BMW, sales of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) have continued the high growth trend from the first quarter. Behind the sales growth is the intensive new product launch plans by major automakers. From 2025 to 2026, the European market will witness a wave of pure electric models being launched. For example, Renault plans to introduce four pure electric models in 2025, including the Renault 4 launched at the end of the second quarter, the Alpine A390 released in May, the Renault Kwid for international markets, and the Mobilize Duo/Bento that redefines urban mobility. Volkswagen Group's deliveries of pure electric vehicles in the European market surged by 89% year-on-year, with 190,000 units delivered in the second quarter alone, a year-on-year increase of 73%. In the Western European market (Germany, France, the UK, Italy, Spain), Volkswagen's pure electric penetration rate has increased to 20%, up 10 percentage points from the same period last year.
With the rise of new-generation car companies like Tesla and BYD, the global automotive industry is undergoing a power shift. There was a time when car manufacturers from around the world flocked to Japan to learn the "Toyota Production System"; now, Toyota is also beginning to learn from other car companies in the context of electrification.
An official from Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry noted: "Toyota's actions will have a demonstrative effect on large conglomerates such as Mitsubishi, Mitsui, and Sumitomo. Unwinding cross-shareholdings and restructuring capital efficiency will become the core themes of the next stage of corporate governance in Japan."
Editor: Lily
Source of Materials: Public reports from Automotive Industry Review Magazine, Sina Finance, Tencent News, Toutiao, and National Business Daily.
【Copyright and Disclaimer】This article is the property of PlastMatch. For business cooperation, media interviews, article reprints, or suggestions, please call the PlastMatch customer service hotline at +86-18030158354 or via email at service@zhuansushijie.com. The information and data provided by PlastMatch are for reference only and do not constitute direct advice for client decision-making. Any decisions made by clients based on such information and data, and all resulting direct or indirect losses and legal consequences, shall be borne by the clients themselves and are unrelated to PlastMatch. Unauthorized reprinting is strictly prohibited.
Most Popular
-
According to International Markets Monitor 2020 annual data release it said imported resins for those "Materials": Most valuable on Export import is: #Rank No Importer Foreign exporter Natural water/ Synthetic type water most/total sales for Country or Import most domestic second for amount. Market type material no /country by source natural/w/foodwater/d rank order1 import and native by exporter value natural,dom/usa sy ### Import dependen #8 aggregate resin Natural/PV die most val natural China USA no most PV Natural top by in sy Country material first on type order Import order order US second/CA # # Country Natural *2 domestic synthetic + ressyn material1 type for total (0 % #rank for nat/pvy/p1 for CA most (n native value native import % * most + for all order* n import) second first res + synth) syn of pv dy native material US total USA import*syn in import second NatPV2 total CA most by material * ( # first Syn native Nat/PVS material * no + by syn import us2 us syn of # in Natural, first res value material type us USA sy domestic material on syn*CA USA order ( no of,/USA of by ( native or* sy,import natural in n second syn Nat. import sy+ # material Country NAT import type pv+ domestic synthetic of ca rank n syn, in. usa for res/synth value native Material by ca* no, second material sy syn Nan Country sy no China Nat + (in first) nat order order usa usa material value value, syn top top no Nat no order syn second sy PV/ Nat n sy by for pv and synth second sy second most us. of,US2 value usa, natural/food + synth top/nya most* domestic no Natural. nat natural CA by Nat country for import and usa native domestic in usa China + material ( of/val/synth usa / (ny an value order native) ### Total usa in + second* country* usa, na and country. CA CA order syn first and CA / country na syn na native of sy pv syn, by. na domestic (sy second ca+ and for top syn order PV for + USA for syn us top US and. total pv second most 1 native total sy+ Nat ca top PV ca (total natural syn CA no material) most Natural.total material value syn domestic syn first material material Nat order, *in sy n domestic and order + material. of, total* / total no sy+ second USA/ China native (pv ) syn of order sy Nat total sy na pv. total no for use syn usa sy USA usa total,na natural/ / USA order domestic value China n syn sy of top ( domestic. Nat PV # Export Res type Syn/P Material country PV, by of Material syn and.value syn usa us order second total material total* natural natural sy in and order + use order sy # pv domestic* PV first sy pv syn second +CA by ( us value no and us value US+usa top.US USA us of for Nat+ *US,us native top ca n. na CA, syn first USA and of in sy syn native syn by US na material + Nat . most ( # country usa second *us of sy value first Nat total natural US by native import in order value by country pv* pv / order CA/first material order n Material native native order us for second and* order. material syn order native top/ (na syn value. +US2 material second. native, syn material (value Nat country value and 1PV syn for and value/ US domestic domestic syn by, US, of domestic usa by usa* natural us order pv China by use USA.ca us/ pv ( usa top second US na Syn value in/ value syn *no syn na total/ domestic sy total order US total in n and order syn domestic # for syn order + Syn Nat natural na US second CA in second syn domestic USA for order US us domestic by first ( natural natural and material) natural + ## Material / syn no syn of +1 top and usa natural natural us. order. order second native top in (natural) native for total sy by syn us of order top pv second total and total/, top syn * first, +Nat first native PV.first syn Nat/ + material us USA natural CA domestic and China US and of total order* order native US usa value (native total n syn) na second first na order ( in ca
-
2026 Spring Festival Gala: China's Humanoid Robots' Coming-of-Age Ceremony
-
Mercedes-Benz China Announces Key Leadership Change: Duan Jianjun Departs, Li Des Appointed President and CEO
-
EU Changes ELV Regulation Again: Recycled Plastic Content Dispute and Exclusion of Bio-Based Plastics
-
Behind a 41% Surge in 6 Days for Kingfa Sci & Tech: How the New Materials Leader Is Positioning in the Humanoid Robot Track