EU's "Dual Regulations" Emerge: Subsidy Limits and Recycled Content Thresholds Imposed, Posing Strong Challenges for Chinese Automakers Venturing Abroad
February 18th news indicates that the European Commission plans to incorporate new rules into the "Net Zero Industry Act," requiring electric vehicles to have 70% EU-made components to be eligible for government subsidies. By value, at least 70% of components, excluding batteries, must be produced in the EU, and several core battery components also require local production. This measure is clearly aimed at protecting the EU's domestic manufacturing base and addressing the import pressure of low-priced Chinese electric vehicles. Simultaneously, the EU has established an initial €1.8 billion "battery boost fund" to support the construction of local battery gigafactories. However, most EU automakers currently rely on Chinese and Korean suppliers for battery packs, and some joint venture battery companies have even scaled back their gigafactory construction plans in the EU.
In December, the Council of the EU and the European Parliament reached a provisional agreement on the Regulation on Circularity Requirements for Vehicle Design and Management of End-of-Life Vehicles. This regulation puts forward binding requirements around the proportion of recyclable materials used, the supervision of end-of-life vehicles, the responsibilities of car manufacturers, and export controls, attempting to promote the transformation of the European automotive industry towards a circular model. Organizations such as the European Association of Automotive Suppliers (CLEPA) are calling for the strengthening of local content rules, maintaining the existing proportion of locally sourced components in EU-assembled vehicles, and clarifying the definition of "Made in Europe."

Source: Fast Technology
New Subsidy Rules: Chinese Automakers' "Cost Conundrum"
The EU's new electric vehicle subsidy regulations will have a significant impact on the cost of Chinese automakers going global. To meet the 70% local content requirement, Chinese car companies will need to establish or expand parts production bases in the EU. This means substantial upfront investment in factory construction, equipment procurement, and personnel recruitment and training. For instance, building a battery core component production plant in the EU, from site selection and construction to commissioning, could take several years and hundreds of millions of euros.
Moreover, the EU's local component supply chain may not fully meet the needs of Chinese car companies, and some key components may still need to be imported from China or other regions, which will increase logistics costs and the difficulty of supply chain management. In addition, the price of EU-made components may be higher than that in China, further pushing up production costs. Rising costs may reduce the price competitiveness of Chinese car companies in the EU market, affecting market share and profit margins. Chinese car companies that originally opened the EU market with cost-effectiveness advantages may lose some price-sensitive customers due to increased costs.
Recycled Materials Mandate: Technical Certification and Supply Chain Restructuring Challenges
The EU's "Regulation on End-of-Life Vehicles" poses significant technical and certification challenges for Chinese automakers. The regulation mandates that new cars achieve a recycled plastic content of 15% within six years of its enactment and 25% within ten years, with at least 20% of the recycled plastic originating from end-of-life vehicles. Subsequent targets for the use of recycled materials like steel and aluminum will also be introduced. However, the application of recycled materials in automobiles faces performance and cost barriers.
In terms of performance, recycled materials need to undergo extensive testing and validation to meet automotive safety and performance indicator requirements. While car manufacturers are currently increasing R&D investment, there is still a gap compared to automotive-grade requirements. For example, the strength and heat resistance of recycled plastics may be inferior to virgin plastics, affecting the service life and safety of some automotive components. In terms of cost, bio-based materials have high R&D investment, and costs can only decrease with large-scale application. While recycled aluminum and steel have cost advantages, cost control for bio-based materials remains a challenge.
Simultaneously, the application of recycled materials involves international certification issues. Exporting overseas requires obtaining international system certifications, in which Chinese automakers have shortcomings. Currently, the utilization rate of recycled materials in China is low, and the construction of certification systems is insufficient. Even if the recycling rate is not low, the actual usage rate of recycled materials is relatively low, making it difficult to meet EU requirements.
Supply chain restructuring is also a major challenge. Regulations require car manufacturers to ensure that new car designs facilitate parts recycling, reuse, and remanufacturing, which necessitates close cooperation between car manufacturers and their supply chains. Multinational car manufacturers have already begun to collaborate with their supply chains: BMW has introduced natural flax fiber composites, Volkswagen has increased the use of recycled materials, and Japanese car manufacturers such as Toyota, Honda, and Nissan also have corresponding plans. If Chinese car manufacturers want to gain a foothold in the EU market, they will also need to restructure their supply chains and establish supporting recycling and recycled material industrial chains, but this will not happen overnight.
Countermeasures: A Multi-pronged Approach to Navigate EU Regulations
Facing challenges from EU regulations, Chinese automakers need to adopt a multi-pronged approach to respond proactively. In terms of technological research and development, they should increase investment in R&D for recycled materials, collaborate with universities and research institutions, and overcome performance challenges. For instance, developing novel recycled plastics with enhanced strength and heat resistance would enable their application in more critical automotive parts. Simultaneously, exploring pathways for the large-scale application of bio-based materials is crucial to reduce costs.
In terms of supply chain construction, strengthen cooperation with local EU suppliers to jointly develop components and recycled materials that meet regulatory requirements. Establish recycling networks and recycled material production bases in the EU to improve the self-sufficiency rate of recycled materials. For example, cooperate with local recycling companies to establish an end-of-life vehicle recycling system to ensure a stable source of recycled plastics.
Actively participate in international standard setting, strengthen communication and cooperation with international certification bodies, understand certification requirements and processes, and proactively plan certification work. Establish a comprehensive quality management system to ensure that the production and application of recycled materials meet international standards.
At the policy level, the government can introduce relevant policies to support car manufacturers in expanding overseas, such as providing financial subsidies and tax incentives, to encourage car manufacturers to invest in factories and conduct technological research and development in the EU. Strengthen communication and consultation with the EU government to strive for a more reasonable transition period and policy space, creating favorable conditions for Chinese car manufacturers to adapt to regulations.
The EU's "double standards" pose a new challenge for Chinese automakers expanding into Europe, but also an opportunity to enhance their competitiveness and promote industrial upgrading. Chinese automakers should actively respond by implementing measures such as technological innovation, supply chain restructuring, and policy support to overcome EU regulatory barriers and achieve sustainable development in the European market.
【Copyright and Disclaimer】The above information is collected and organized by PlastMatch. The copyright belongs to the original author. This article is reprinted for the purpose of providing more information, and it does not imply that PlastMatch endorses the views expressed in the article or guarantees its accuracy. If there are any errors in the source attribution or if your legitimate rights have been infringed, please contact us, and we will promptly correct or remove the content. If other media, websites, or individuals use the aforementioned content, they must clearly indicate the original source and origin of the work and assume legal responsibility on their own.
Most Popular
-
Elkem Sells Silicone Business Assets! Combined Losses of 8 Major South Korean Petrochemical Firms Widen; Avient Announces Dyneema Capacity Expansion
-
According to International Markets Monitor 2020 annual data release it said imported resins for those "Materials": Most valuable on Export import is: #Rank No Importer Foreign exporter Natural water/ Synthetic type water most/total sales for Country or Import most domestic second for amount. Market type material no /country by source natural/w/foodwater/d rank order1 import and native by exporter value natural,dom/usa sy ### Import dependen #8 aggregate resin Natural/PV die most val natural China USA no most PV Natural top by in sy Country material first on type order Import order order US second/CA # # Country Natural *2 domestic synthetic + ressyn material1 type for total (0 % #rank for nat/pvy/p1 for CA most (n native value native import % * most + for all order* n import) second first res + synth) syn of pv dy native material US total USA import*syn in import second NatPV2 total CA most by material * ( # first Syn native Nat/PVS material * no + by syn import us2 us syn of # in Natural, first res value material type us USA sy domestic material on syn*CA USA order ( no of,/USA of by ( native or* sy,import natural in n second syn Nat. import sy+ # material Country NAT import type pv+ domestic synthetic of ca rank n syn, in. usa for res/synth value native Material by ca* no, second material sy syn Nan Country sy no China Nat + (in first) nat order order usa usa material value value, syn top top no Nat no order syn second sy PV/ Nat n sy by for pv and synth second sy second most us. of,US2 value usa, natural/food + synth top/nya most* domestic no Natural. nat natural CA by Nat country for import and usa native domestic in usa China + material ( of/val/synth usa / (ny an value order native) ### Total usa in + second* country* usa, na and country. CA CA order syn first and CA / country na syn na native of sy pv syn, by. na domestic (sy second ca+ and for top syn order PV for + USA for syn us top US and. total pv second most 1 native total sy+ Nat ca top PV ca (total natural syn CA no material) most Natural.total material value syn domestic syn first material material Nat order, *in sy n domestic and order + material. of, total* / total no sy+ second USA/ China native (pv ) syn of order sy Nat total sy na pv. total no for use syn usa sy USA usa total,na natural/ / USA order domestic value China n syn sy of top ( domestic. Nat PV # Export Res type Syn/P Material country PV, by of Material syn and.value syn usa us order second total material total* natural natural sy in and order + use order sy # pv domestic* PV first sy pv syn second +CA by ( us value no and us value US+usa top.US USA us of for Nat+ *US,us native top ca n. na CA, syn first USA and of in sy syn native syn by US na material + Nat . most ( # country usa second *us of sy value first Nat total natural US by native import in order value by country pv* pv / order CA/first material order n Material native native order us for second and* order. material syn order native top/ (na syn value. +US2 material second. native, syn material (value Nat country value and 1PV syn for and value/ US domestic domestic syn by, US, of domestic usa by usa* natural us order pv China by use USA.ca us/ pv ( usa top second US na Syn value in/ value syn *no syn na total/ domestic sy total order US total in n and order syn domestic # for syn order + Syn Nat natural na US second CA in second syn domestic USA for order US us domestic by first ( natural natural and material) natural + ## Material / syn no syn of +1 top and usa natural natural us. order. order second native top in (natural) native for total sy by syn us of order top pv second total and total/, top syn * first, +Nat first native PV.first syn Nat/ + material us USA natural CA domestic and China US and of total order* order native US usa value (native total n syn) na second first na order ( in ca
-
2026 Spring Festival Gala: China's Humanoid Robots' Coming-of-Age Ceremony
-
Breaking: EU Imposes 79% Anti-Dumping Tariff on Several China Products
-
EU Changes ELV Regulation Again: Recycled Plastic Content Dispute and Exclusion of Bio-Based Plastics