Latest Response! European Union Passes €93 Billion Tariff Countermeasure Plan Against the US
According to CCTV News, on July 24 local time, the correspondent of China Media Group learned thatOn the same day, the EU member states voted to pass a measure to impose countervailing duties on U.S. products totaling 93 billion euros.

EU (file photo)
According to reports, an EU Commission spokesperson stated on July 23 that the EU plans to merge two retaliatory tariff lists targeting US exports into a single unified list totaling 93 billion euros. The EU obtained member state approval for this earlier in April.U.S. soybeans, motorcycles, jeans, and other goodsThe first round of tariff measures amounting to approximately 21 billion euros was implemented. On July 23, the European Union member states voted on and passed another list valued at approximately 72 billion euros. This list mainly...Involving high-value industrial products such as airplanes, automobiles, and electrical equipment.The formation of two listsThe total amount of the package of retaliatory measures reaches 93 billion euros.。
Previously, the EU and several European national leaders stated that if a satisfactory trade agreement could not be reached with the US before the US tariff measures take effect on August 1, the EU would take countermeasures in response. On July 23, European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill stated that if the negotiations break down, the countermeasures will take effect on August 7.
Recent news continues to emerge from the trade negotiations between Europe and the United States. This tariff game, which is crucial to the global supply chain landscape and economic development, is attracting significant attention! Specs World outlines the background, impact, and reactions from various parties regarding this event as follows:
EU integration retaliation list to strengthen negotiation position
Olof Gill, spokesperson for EU trade, said on Wednesday that the EU has merged two previous retaliatory lists targeting US goods worth €21 billion and €72 billion into a single list worth €93 billion, covering products such as bourbon whiskey, airplanes, soybeans, and auto parts. Gill emphasized that this move makes the retaliatory measures "clearer, simpler, and tougher," and is expected to take effect on August 7, although the EU may extend the suspension period. This list is a response to Trump's March steel and aluminum tariffs and the recent threat of a 30% tariff, aiming to force the Trump administration to compromise by precisely targeting key US industries.
Trump's tariff threats escalate, casting uncertainty over negotiation prospects.
The Trump administration recently announced a 15% tariff agreement with Japan and has now turned its attention to the European Union, threatening to impose a 30% tariff on EU goods if no agreement is reached by August 1. The EU has prioritized negotiations, attempting to secure concessions by increasing purchases of American liquefied natural gas or soybeans, but recent talks have stalled. Šefčovič stated that Trump’s “tariff game” threatens the world’s largest trading relationship, with daily trade in goods and services exceeding $5 billion. The Financial Times pointed out that internal coordination within the EU faces challenges: France and Italy are concerned about the impact on alcohol exports, while Germany’s automotive and pharmaceutical industries hope to avoid a full-scale trade war.
Economic and Political Impact Analysis
Tensions in US-European trade relations could have far-reaching effects on the global economy. In 2024, the US trade deficit with the European Union reached $235 billion, which Trump regards as a bargaining chip. However, Goldman Sachs economists believe the actual tariffs may be below 30%, leaving Trump with room for negotiation. If the EU’s retaliation list is implemented, it will drive up costs for US companies, with Boeing and agricultural states likely to suffer heavy losses. According to the European Central Bank, a 30% tariff could reduce the eurozone’s economic growth rate by 0.5 percentage points. JPMorgan Chase (July 20, 2025) warns that if the trade war escalates, global markets could plunge into turmoil.
Tough responses from European political figures
EU leaders expressed a tough stance on Trump's threats while emphasizing negotiation as a priority.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen: "We are committed to dialogue, but the EU is ready to decisively defend its own interests." She stated that the anti-coercion tool would only be used in "special circumstances," demonstrating a cautious attitude.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz: "The German economy cannot withstand the impact of a 30% tariff. We must demonstrate strength while seeking solutions." He supports a tough retaliatory response from the EU.
French President Emmanuel Macron: "The European Union cannot passively accept attacks; anti-coercion instruments are one of the options." He called for a swift response but to avoid a full-scale trade war.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni: "A trade war is not beneficial to either side; the EU should safeguard the Western alliance through negotiations." She is inclined toward compromise.
Tough rhetoric from American politicians
The Trump administration took a tough stance on trade issues, attempting to pressure the European Union through high tariffs.
U.S. President Donald Trump: "If the EU retaliates, we will increase tariffs to over 30% to protect American interests." He views tariffs as a key tool in negotiations.
White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett: "The EU's proposal is insufficient to meet U.S. demands; tariffs are a realistic option." He hinted that greater concessions are needed in the negotiations.
Investment Banks and Media Commentary
Goldman Sachs: "The EU's expanded merger list strengthens its negotiating position, and Trump may compromise with lower tariffs to avoid a full-scale trade war."
Bruegel think tank: "The EU may join forces with Canada and Mexico to pressure the United States and force Trump to soften his stance."
The Wall Street Journal: "German officials stated, 'If they want war, we will oblige,' indicating a hardening stance within the European Union."
Reuters: "The EU is considering using anti-coercion tools to restrict U.S. companies' access to public procurement and financial markets, with increasing support from Germany."
Bloomberg: "The EU may seek concessions by increasing imports of U.S. liquefied natural gas, but internal coordination remains divided."
Prospects and Potential Risks
(The above is comprehensively compiled from CCTV News and Hui Tong Finance.)
【Copyright and Disclaimer】The above information is collected and organized by PlastMatch. The copyright belongs to the original author. This article is reprinted for the purpose of providing more information, and it does not imply that PlastMatch endorses the views expressed in the article or guarantees its accuracy. If there are any errors in the source attribution or if your legitimate rights have been infringed, please contact us, and we will promptly correct or remove the content. If other media, websites, or individuals use the aforementioned content, they must clearly indicate the original source and origin of the work and assume legal responsibility on their own.
Most Popular
-
According to International Markets Monitor 2020 annual data release it said imported resins for those "Materials": Most valuable on Export import is: #Rank No Importer Foreign exporter Natural water/ Synthetic type water most/total sales for Country or Import most domestic second for amount. Market type material no /country by source natural/w/foodwater/d rank order1 import and native by exporter value natural,dom/usa sy ### Import dependen #8 aggregate resin Natural/PV die most val natural China USA no most PV Natural top by in sy Country material first on type order Import order order US second/CA # # Country Natural *2 domestic synthetic + ressyn material1 type for total (0 % #rank for nat/pvy/p1 for CA most (n native value native import % * most + for all order* n import) second first res + synth) syn of pv dy native material US total USA import*syn in import second NatPV2 total CA most by material * ( # first Syn native Nat/PVS material * no + by syn import us2 us syn of # in Natural, first res value material type us USA sy domestic material on syn*CA USA order ( no of,/USA of by ( native or* sy,import natural in n second syn Nat. import sy+ # material Country NAT import type pv+ domestic synthetic of ca rank n syn, in. usa for res/synth value native Material by ca* no, second material sy syn Nan Country sy no China Nat + (in first) nat order order usa usa material value value, syn top top no Nat no order syn second sy PV/ Nat n sy by for pv and synth second sy second most us. of,US2 value usa, natural/food + synth top/nya most* domestic no Natural. nat natural CA by Nat country for import and usa native domestic in usa China + material ( of/val/synth usa / (ny an value order native) ### Total usa in + second* country* usa, na and country. CA CA order syn first and CA / country na syn na native of sy pv syn, by. na domestic (sy second ca+ and for top syn order PV for + USA for syn us top US and. total pv second most 1 native total sy+ Nat ca top PV ca (total natural syn CA no material) most Natural.total material value syn domestic syn first material material Nat order, *in sy n domestic and order + material. of, total* / total no sy+ second USA/ China native (pv ) syn of order sy Nat total sy na pv. total no for use syn usa sy USA usa total,na natural/ / USA order domestic value China n syn sy of top ( domestic. Nat PV # Export Res type Syn/P Material country PV, by of Material syn and.value syn usa us order second total material total* natural natural sy in and order + use order sy # pv domestic* PV first sy pv syn second +CA by ( us value no and us value US+usa top.US USA us of for Nat+ *US,us native top ca n. na CA, syn first USA and of in sy syn native syn by US na material + Nat . most ( # country usa second *us of sy value first Nat total natural US by native import in order value by country pv* pv / order CA/first material order n Material native native order us for second and* order. material syn order native top/ (na syn value. +US2 material second. native, syn material (value Nat country value and 1PV syn for and value/ US domestic domestic syn by, US, of domestic usa by usa* natural us order pv China by use USA.ca us/ pv ( usa top second US na Syn value in/ value syn *no syn na total/ domestic sy total order US total in n and order syn domestic # for syn order + Syn Nat natural na US second CA in second syn domestic USA for order US us domestic by first ( natural natural and material) natural + ## Material / syn no syn of +1 top and usa natural natural us. order. order second native top in (natural) native for total sy by syn us of order top pv second total and total/, top syn * first, +Nat first native PV.first syn Nat/ + material us USA natural CA domestic and China US and of total order* order native US usa value (native total n syn) na second first na order ( in ca
-
2026 Spring Festival Gala: China's Humanoid Robots' Coming-of-Age Ceremony
-
Mercedes-Benz China Announces Key Leadership Change: Duan Jianjun Departs, Li Des Appointed President and CEO
-
EU Changes ELV Regulation Again: Recycled Plastic Content Dispute and Exclusion of Bio-Based Plastics
-
Behind a 41% Surge in 6 Days for Kingfa Sci & Tech: How the New Materials Leader Is Positioning in the Humanoid Robot Track