Investment Landscape of China’s Electric Vehicle Industry Shifts, Overseas Surpasses Domestic for the First Time, Battery Companies Become Main Force
Recently, a research report released by Rhodium Group showed that in 2024, for the first time, overseas investment by Chinese electric vehicle industry chain enterprises surpassed domestic investment. Despite higher costs, delays, and risks faced by overseas projects, this shift has still occurred, marking a "historic transformation" in the investment landscape of China's electric vehicle industry.
According to data from the Rhodium Group, Chinese electric vehicle industry chain companies are expected to invest approximately $16 billion overseas in 2024, a figure slightly higher than the $15 billion investment domestically. In comparison, nearly 80% of investment in this industry used to be concentrated domestically.

Image source: Changan Automobile
So, what is the driving logic behind this transformation? What challenges will enterprises face in their overseas expansion? And how should they break through and move forward in the future?
Differences between domestic and international markets drive the investment focus towards overseas.
The investment in China's electric vehicle industry has shifted from "domestic-led" to "overseas breakthrough," essentially as a result of the combined effects of changes in both domestic and international market environments.
In the domestic market, the long-term rapid development has gradually led the industry into a "saturation period," with the investment space continuously narrowing. In the past, China, with its large consumer base, comprehensive industrial chain support, and policy incentives, became the world's largest electric vehicle market, attracting a massive influx of capital. However, as production capacity rapidly expands, the market supply-demand relationship has gradually become imbalanced, with the problem of overcapacity increasingly prominent. Coupled with price wars initiated by companies competing for market share, the profit margins across the entire industrial chain have been severely compressed. From vehicle manufacturers to battery suppliers, and down to downstream component companies, profits have generally declined, and the domestic investment return rate continues to decrease.
In sharp contrast to the "cooling down" of the domestic market, the overseas market is experiencing a "rising period" of rapidly growing demand for electric vehicles and holds significant strategic value, becoming a core motivation for Chinese companies to establish a presence. To achieve carbon reduction goals, regions such as Europe, North America, and Southeast Asia have introduced encouraging policies: Europe stimulates consumer purchases through subsidies and tax incentives, North America increases investment in charging infrastructure, and Southeast Asia, leveraging its demographic dividend and market potential, is becoming a new growth pole. More critically, overseas expansion can help companies circumvent trade barriers and reduce costs.
Against this backdrop, Chinese enterprises are accelerating their overseas expansion.For example, as the world's largest electric vehicle battery manufacturer, CATL stated in June this year that due to the fierce competition in the domestic Chinese automotive market, overseas expansion has become its "top priority." BYD, China's top-selling electric vehicle manufacturer, has factories in Brazil and Thailand and plans to build plants in Turkey and Indonesia. Chery Automobile plans to invest $1 billion to build an electric vehicle factory in Turkey.

Image source: CATL
It is worth noting that battery manufacturers have become the absolute main force in this wave of overseas investment. According to data from the Rhodium Group, about three-quarters of the foreign investment comes from battery manufacturers.
High transportation costs and the demand for localized supply are the main driving forces behind battery manufacturers' overseas investments. Power batteries are large in size and heavy in weight, resulting in high transportation costs. Moreover, automakers are increasingly demanding localized supply to ensure supply chain stability. The report states that major Chinese battery manufacturers such as CATL and Gotion High-Tech are following in the footsteps of international clients like Tesla and BMW to expand into overseas markets, driven by high transportation costs and overseas customers' requirements for localized supply.
Challenges of Overseas Investment and the Future of the Industry
Despite the strong momentum of overseas investment by Chinese electric vehicle industry chain enterprises, the complexity of overseas markets far exceeds that of the domestic market, and companies face multiple challenges including costs, timelines, regulatory, and political risks.
In terms of costs, overseas projects generally face higher expenses for land acquisition, plant construction, and labor compared to domestic projects. Regarding timelines, domestic battery factories can typically begin construction within 3 to 12 months, whereas overseas projects must contend with complex approval processes, local environmental standards, and building codes, often requiring 10 to 24 months. This significantly increases capital occupancy costs and market uncertainties.
Regulatory and political risks are major obstacles to overseas expansion for companies. Different countries have vastly different environmental standards, safety certifications, and data compliance requirements for electric vehicles, necessitating significant resource investment from companies to adapt. Fluctuations in the political landscape add further uncertainty, as geopolitical conflicts may disrupt supply chains and sudden policy changes can directly impact project progress. According to data from the Rhodium Group, only 25% of announced overseas electric vehicle manufacturing projects have been completed, whereas the completion rate for projects within China is 45%.
Despite the many challenges, the "historic shift" where overseas investment surpasses domestic investment has opened up new opportunities for the globalization of China's electric vehicle industry.
From a long-term perspective, overseas expansion can help enterprises integrate more deeply into the global industrial chain: at the technological level, companies can leverage overseas R&D centers and talent resources to collaborate with internationally advanced enterprises, accelerating breakthroughs in cutting-edge technologies such as solid-state batteries and battery recycling; at the market level, localized production enables companies to more accurately capture local consumer demands—for example, European consumers place greater emphasis on vehicle safety and design, while the Southeast Asian market has a strong demand for economical models. Targeted product adjustments can further increase market share. Meanwhile, the establishment of overseas factories can also drive upstream domestic material and equipment companies to "go global," forming a global layout of the entire industrial chain and enhancing the discourse power of China's electric vehicle industry within the global value chain.

Image Source: Chery Automobile
For enterprises, the key to addressing overseas challenges lies in formulating a "refined" investment strategy. During the investment decision-making phase, it is essential to form a professional team to conduct in-depth research on the target market's political environment, legal system, and cultural customs, and to assess the stability of policies and the potential of market demand, in order to avoid blind expansion. During project implementation, companies should strengthen communication with local governments, communities, and unions, and actively fulfill social responsibilities. For example, in the construction of its factory in Hungary, CATL simultaneously advanced local employee training and environmental facility upgrades, earning recognition from the local government and residents. Additionally, companies can reduce risks through joint ventures, collaborations, and technology licensing. For instance, Chery's joint venture model with Spain's EV MOTORS not only allows for rapid implementation by leveraging local resources but also helps circumvent certain trade barriers.
The transformation of the investment landscape in China's electric vehicle industry is not a short-term "policy-driven" or "market speculation" phenomenon, but rather an inevitable choice for the industry to shift from "scale expansion" to "quality improvement" and from "domestic leadership" to "global competition." In the context of the accelerated iteration of the global electric vehicle industry, Chinese companies must face overseas challenges squarely and advance their global expansion with more mature strategies and steadier steps. Only then can they take the initiative in international competition and lay a solid foundation for the long-term development of China's electric vehicle industry.
【Copyright and Disclaimer】The above information is collected and organized by PlastMatch. The copyright belongs to the original author. This article is reprinted for the purpose of providing more information, and it does not imply that PlastMatch endorses the views expressed in the article or guarantees its accuracy. If there are any errors in the source attribution or if your legitimate rights have been infringed, please contact us, and we will promptly correct or remove the content. If other media, websites, or individuals use the aforementioned content, they must clearly indicate the original source and origin of the work and assume legal responsibility on their own.
Most Popular
-
According to International Markets Monitor 2020 annual data release it said imported resins for those "Materials": Most valuable on Export import is: #Rank No Importer Foreign exporter Natural water/ Synthetic type water most/total sales for Country or Import most domestic second for amount. Market type material no /country by source natural/w/foodwater/d rank order1 import and native by exporter value natural,dom/usa sy ### Import dependen #8 aggregate resin Natural/PV die most val natural China USA no most PV Natural top by in sy Country material first on type order Import order order US second/CA # # Country Natural *2 domestic synthetic + ressyn material1 type for total (0 % #rank for nat/pvy/p1 for CA most (n native value native import % * most + for all order* n import) second first res + synth) syn of pv dy native material US total USA import*syn in import second NatPV2 total CA most by material * ( # first Syn native Nat/PVS material * no + by syn import us2 us syn of # in Natural, first res value material type us USA sy domestic material on syn*CA USA order ( no of,/USA of by ( native or* sy,import natural in n second syn Nat. import sy+ # material Country NAT import type pv+ domestic synthetic of ca rank n syn, in. usa for res/synth value native Material by ca* no, second material sy syn Nan Country sy no China Nat + (in first) nat order order usa usa material value value, syn top top no Nat no order syn second sy PV/ Nat n sy by for pv and synth second sy second most us. of,US2 value usa, natural/food + synth top/nya most* domestic no Natural. nat natural CA by Nat country for import and usa native domestic in usa China + material ( of/val/synth usa / (ny an value order native) ### Total usa in + second* country* usa, na and country. CA CA order syn first and CA / country na syn na native of sy pv syn, by. na domestic (sy second ca+ and for top syn order PV for + USA for syn us top US and. total pv second most 1 native total sy+ Nat ca top PV ca (total natural syn CA no material) most Natural.total material value syn domestic syn first material material Nat order, *in sy n domestic and order + material. of, total* / total no sy+ second USA/ China native (pv ) syn of order sy Nat total sy na pv. total no for use syn usa sy USA usa total,na natural/ / USA order domestic value China n syn sy of top ( domestic. Nat PV # Export Res type Syn/P Material country PV, by of Material syn and.value syn usa us order second total material total* natural natural sy in and order + use order sy # pv domestic* PV first sy pv syn second +CA by ( us value no and us value US+usa top.US USA us of for Nat+ *US,us native top ca n. na CA, syn first USA and of in sy syn native syn by US na material + Nat . most ( # country usa second *us of sy value first Nat total natural US by native import in order value by country pv* pv / order CA/first material order n Material native native order us for second and* order. material syn order native top/ (na syn value. +US2 material second. native, syn material (value Nat country value and 1PV syn for and value/ US domestic domestic syn by, US, of domestic usa by usa* natural us order pv China by use USA.ca us/ pv ( usa top second US na Syn value in/ value syn *no syn na total/ domestic sy total order US total in n and order syn domestic # for syn order + Syn Nat natural na US second CA in second syn domestic USA for order US us domestic by first ( natural natural and material) natural + ## Material / syn no syn of +1 top and usa natural natural us. order. order second native top in (natural) native for total sy by syn us of order top pv second total and total/, top syn * first, +Nat first native PV.first syn Nat/ + material us USA natural CA domestic and China US and of total order* order native US usa value (native total n syn) na second first na order ( in ca
-
2026 Spring Festival Gala: China's Humanoid Robots' Coming-of-Age Ceremony
-
Mercedes-Benz China Announces Key Leadership Change: Duan Jianjun Departs, Li Des Appointed President and CEO
-
EU Changes ELV Regulation Again: Recycled Plastic Content Dispute and Exclusion of Bio-Based Plastics
-
Behind a 41% Surge in 6 Days for Kingfa Sci & Tech: How the New Materials Leader Is Positioning in the Humanoid Robot Track