Oil giants BP, Shell, ExxonMobil fail in transition! Is oil still king?
Since BP admitted that its green transition efforts ended in failure, the trend in the energy sector has been unanimous – major oil companies are returning to oil and gas operations. In late February of this year, BP announced that it would increase its annual investment in oil and gas production by 25%, while cutting its energy transition-related business investments by 70%.

This energy giant is making a strong comeback. According to the Financial Times, BP plans to launch 27 new oil and gas projects in the next five years. The company has just announced a final investment decision for the natural gas project in Trinidad and Tobago, which is expected to come into production in two years, with a peak output of 62,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day. In addition, a $25 billion contract from BP was recently approved by the Iraqi government to develop key oil fields in the Kirkuk region.
On the other hand, the UK and Dutch energy giant Shell has come to realize through a relatively moderate approach that any transition from hydrocarbons to weather-dependent power generation (such as wind and solar) is a high-risk bet. Although a Dutch court ordered Shell to reduce its oil and gas output to lower emissions, the company's investments in wind and solar power have fallen short of expectations. Subsequently, it successfully appealed, and the appellate court overturned this ruling.

Shell recently updated its short-term plans, reducing its spending targets for the next three years and prioritizing the development of its natural gas business. Between 2025 and 2028, the energy giant plans annual capital expenditures of $20 billion to $22 billion, down from its 2023 annual budget of $22 billion to $25 billion. In terms of production targets, Shell aims to increase its annual liquefied natural gas sales by 4-5% by 2030.
TotalEnergies is one of the exceptions among oil giants that have failed in their transformation. The French energy group has implemented a diversified strategy to shift from oil and gas to low-carbon electricity, but notably, it has never neglected its core business while advancing this transition.

In a recent announcement, TotalEnergies claimed that it has achieved the highest average Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) of 14.8% in the industry while significantly reducing emissions. Recent public reports indicate that TotalEnergies has secured the first tranche of external financing for its East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) project in Uganda, marking an important "milestone" for the project.
Compared to their European counterparts, American oil and gas giants like ExxonMobil and Chevron remain steadfast and confident in their commitment to the traditional oil and gas sector. While maintaining their core businesses, these companies have made only limited financial concessions towards the energy transition, resulting in significantly better performance than European firms that have aggressively shifted towards green energy.

ExxonMobil plans to increase oil and gas production by 18% over the next five years and will raise capital expenditure accordingly. Chevron has just launched a major expansion project at the Tengiz oil field in Kazakhstan, which will boost production at this giant field by 260,000 barrels per day. Meanwhile, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) approved Chevron's $53 billion acquisition of Hess Corp. and its Guyana oil assets in January this year, although the deal has since been challenged by ExxonMobil and faces further review.
From the strategic layout of industry giants, the peak period of the oil industry is far from over.
Reference source:
【Copyright and Disclaimer】The above information is collected and organized by PlastMatch. The copyright belongs to the original author. This article is reprinted for the purpose of providing more information, and it does not imply that PlastMatch endorses the views expressed in the article or guarantees its accuracy. If there are any errors in the source attribution or if your legitimate rights have been infringed, please contact us, and we will promptly correct or remove the content. If other media, websites, or individuals use the aforementioned content, they must clearly indicate the original source and origin of the work and assume legal responsibility on their own.
Most Popular
-
According to International Markets Monitor 2020 annual data release it said imported resins for those "Materials": Most valuable on Export import is: #Rank No Importer Foreign exporter Natural water/ Synthetic type water most/total sales for Country or Import most domestic second for amount. Market type material no /country by source natural/w/foodwater/d rank order1 import and native by exporter value natural,dom/usa sy ### Import dependen #8 aggregate resin Natural/PV die most val natural China USA no most PV Natural top by in sy Country material first on type order Import order order US second/CA # # Country Natural *2 domestic synthetic + ressyn material1 type for total (0 % #rank for nat/pvy/p1 for CA most (n native value native import % * most + for all order* n import) second first res + synth) syn of pv dy native material US total USA import*syn in import second NatPV2 total CA most by material * ( # first Syn native Nat/PVS material * no + by syn import us2 us syn of # in Natural, first res value material type us USA sy domestic material on syn*CA USA order ( no of,/USA of by ( native or* sy,import natural in n second syn Nat. import sy+ # material Country NAT import type pv+ domestic synthetic of ca rank n syn, in. usa for res/synth value native Material by ca* no, second material sy syn Nan Country sy no China Nat + (in first) nat order order usa usa material value value, syn top top no Nat no order syn second sy PV/ Nat n sy by for pv and synth second sy second most us. of,US2 value usa, natural/food + synth top/nya most* domestic no Natural. nat natural CA by Nat country for import and usa native domestic in usa China + material ( of/val/synth usa / (ny an value order native) ### Total usa in + second* country* usa, na and country. CA CA order syn first and CA / country na syn na native of sy pv syn, by. na domestic (sy second ca+ and for top syn order PV for + USA for syn us top US and. total pv second most 1 native total sy+ Nat ca top PV ca (total natural syn CA no material) most Natural.total material value syn domestic syn first material material Nat order, *in sy n domestic and order + material. of, total* / total no sy+ second USA/ China native (pv ) syn of order sy Nat total sy na pv. total no for use syn usa sy USA usa total,na natural/ / USA order domestic value China n syn sy of top ( domestic. Nat PV # Export Res type Syn/P Material country PV, by of Material syn and.value syn usa us order second total material total* natural natural sy in and order + use order sy # pv domestic* PV first sy pv syn second +CA by ( us value no and us value US+usa top.US USA us of for Nat+ *US,us native top ca n. na CA, syn first USA and of in sy syn native syn by US na material + Nat . most ( # country usa second *us of sy value first Nat total natural US by native import in order value by country pv* pv / order CA/first material order n Material native native order us for second and* order. material syn order native top/ (na syn value. +US2 material second. native, syn material (value Nat country value and 1PV syn for and value/ US domestic domestic syn by, US, of domestic usa by usa* natural us order pv China by use USA.ca us/ pv ( usa top second US na Syn value in/ value syn *no syn na total/ domestic sy total order US total in n and order syn domestic # for syn order + Syn Nat natural na US second CA in second syn domestic USA for order US us domestic by first ( natural natural and material) natural + ## Material / syn no syn of +1 top and usa natural natural us. order. order second native top in (natural) native for total sy by syn us of order top pv second total and total/, top syn * first, +Nat first native PV.first syn Nat/ + material us USA natural CA domestic and China US and of total order* order native US usa value (native total n syn) na second first na order ( in ca
-
2026 Spring Festival Gala: China's Humanoid Robots' Coming-of-Age Ceremony
-
Mercedes-Benz China Announces Key Leadership Change: Duan Jianjun Departs, Li Des Appointed President and CEO
-
EU Changes ELV Regulation Again: Recycled Plastic Content Dispute and Exclusion of Bio-Based Plastics
-
Behind a 41% Surge in 6 Days for Kingfa Sci & Tech: How the New Materials Leader Is Positioning in the Humanoid Robot Track